Samsung UN46ES8000F 46' 3D LED TV (1920x1080, 240 Hz, HDTV, LED Backlight, 3D)
  • Samsung UN46ES8000F 46' 3D LED TV (1920x1080, 240 Hz, HDTV, LED Backlight, 3D)
  • Samsung UN46ES8000F 46' 3D LED TV (1920x1080, 240 Hz, HDTV, LED Backlight, 3D)
  • Samsung UN46ES8000F 46' 3D LED TV (1920x1080, 240 Hz, HDTV, LED Backlight, 3D)
  • Samsung UN46ES8000F 46' 3D LED TV (1920x1080, 240 Hz, HDTV, LED Backlight, 3D)

Samsung UN46ES8000F 46" 3D LED TV (1920x1080, 240 Hz, HDTV, LED Backlight, 3D)

1 Rating
Pricing Not Available

Description

The UN46ES8000 46-inch Class Slim LED HDTV from Samsung has everything but the kitchen sink. It is one of the most advanced LED units out on the market today. Besides the 3D capability, dual core...More

Description

The UN46ES8000 46-inch Class Slim LED HDTV from Samsung has everything but the kitchen sink. It is one of the most advanced LED units out on the market today. Besides the 3D capability, dual core processor, Skype compatibility and clear motion rate 960Hz, the LED provides face recognition and gesture control software.

Specifications

Quick Glance
Broadcast Format Displayed1080p
Digital TunerATSC
Audio Video ConnectorsHDMI Yes, Component Video Yes, Composite Video Yes, Digital Audio Yes
Display TypeLED-LCD TV w/ Edge LED Backlight
Included Network CardEthernet
Aspect Ratio16:9
3D Compatible3D
Max Resolution1920 x 1080
Display Refresh Rate240 Hz
Display Panel
Diagonal Screen Size46 in
Interface
Interface ConnectionUSB Yes, Ethernet Yes
Physical Specifications
Depth Without Stand1.2 in
Height25.70 in
Width40.90 in
Depth8.30 in
Weight26.50 lbs
Warranty
Warranty Information1 Year
More Info
URLhttp://www.samsungusa.com
See more specifications (4)See less specifications (4)

Pro Reviews

  • Samsung UN46ES8000F

    testseek

    Testseek.com has collected 78 expert reviews for Samsung UN46ES8000F and the average expert rating is 85 of 100. The average score reflects the expert community������s view on this product. Click below and use Testseek.com to see all ratings, product awards and conclusions. Read more

    Editors Rating

    No rating