Reviews Written by PJ Farmer
-
February 6, 2008
Find, Compare, Read Reviews & Buy
Want to see your products in Yahoo! Shopping? Build your own online store or Advertise with us. Current Advertisers Sign In
Help improve Yahoo! Shopping by participating in our user studies - View RSS Feed
Make money with Yahoo! Shopping APIs, now powering Yahoo! Tech. Learn more about our paid syndication program.
Copyright ©2009 Yahoo! Inc. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Copyright Policy - Security and Disclaimer.
Information about prices, products, services and merchants is provided by third parties and is for informational purposes only. Yahoo! does not represent or warrant the accuracy or reliability of the information, and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use.
Compared these to the Bose QC3
Pros: Price, comfortability, monitor switch, AA battery
Cons: Sound
When I first got them, I thought they sounded static-y. But then when I made the mistake of comparing them with the QC-3, wow! What a difference. The Sony has a bit of a hum that some users say is also present in the QC2 (I had 3 other colleagues do the compare too. 2 of 3 could hear the hum).
But the bose is so much clearer, fuller, and has much better highs and midranges. The base in the sony is pretty sweet though.
Here is more food for thought -- I took them both to the gym, and the QC3 does not work with the cardio theater audio boxes attached to the machines unless I use the airplace adapter (which then quiets the sound to annoying levels). Odd.
You might be happy with the Sonys, if you aren't an audophile and if you don't do a side-by-side with the QC-3. ...